Blog

Leesburg FL Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Supreme Court doesn’t adopt new law as evidence rule

Posted by Guy DiMartino | Dec 12, 2013 | 0 Comments

Leesburg Florida medical malpractice lawyer, Guy S. DiMartino, discusses the Supreme Court's recent failure to adopt Florida Statute 766.102(12) as a rule of evidence. 

Governor Scott and the legislature has been chipping away at consumers and patients rights since they have been in office. In 2012, the Florida legislature added section 12 to the expert witness requirements in Florida medical malpractice cases.  In essence, the law required expert witnesses to either be licensed in Florida or register with the Board of Medicine as an expert witness in Florida.  In practice, this law makes it much harder for injured patients and their families to find an expert witness to support their allegations.  Why? Because doctors who belong to the same state associations and practice in the same region are much more hesitant to criticize a colleague.  Typically, patients have to go out of state to find expert witnesses.

So with this law, the patient's lawyer has to find an expert out of state and then ask them to register with the Florida Department of Health as an expert witness – which is another hurdle. Well, the Florida bar committee on evidence brought this law to the Florida Supreme Court asking the court to amend the evidence code and make the law a rule of evidence.

In denying the rule, the Supreme Court said:

The Board of Governors voted 34-5 to recommend that the Court reject the Committee's proposal, on the grounds that the provision is unconstitutional, will have a chilling effect on the ability to obtain expert witnesses, and is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Numerous comments were filed with respect to this proposal, all in opposition to its adoption. After hearing oral argument and carefully considering the Committee's recommendation in light of those comments, we decline to follow this recommendation due to the concerns raised.

Accordingly, the Court declines to adopt the legislative changes to the Code or newly created section 766.102(12), Florida Statutes, to the extent they are procedural.

What the Court's failure to adopt the statute means in actual practice I do not yet know because I'm not aware of a patient who has challenged the law as unconstitutional.  In order to do that, the patient would have to hire an out of state expert, have the expert refuse to register with the Department of Health, and then the trial court would have to dismiss the action.  This could be pretty risky for an injured person.

What are your thoughts about the recent changes to Florida medical malpractice law?

About the Author

Guy DiMartino

I have loved helping people in need for almost three decades.  It has been my privilege to serve people as their pastor, chiropractor, and lawyer.  The current focus of my legal practice and life’s passion is helping the seriously injured receive complete compensation for their injuries. I am a Florida Board Certified Civil Trial Attorney. What that really means is that I am no stranger to the courtroom.  I have successfully tried and handled serious cases in state and federal courts.  My backgrounds in both law and chiropractic medicine have given me a unique perspective, extensive knowledge, and wide experience to serve those I represent. For years as a chiropractic physician, I treated my patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. Now as their lawyer, I fight to bring them financial compensation for their pain and suffering. During my years of service, I have handled many traumatic injury cases ranging from the traumatic amputation of a limb to brain and spinal cord injury.  I consider it an honor to serve you and your family. When a person entrusts me and I accept to represent them, I don’t take that relationship and responsibility lightly. My approach is that we work as a team. We are partners and our goal is the best outcome for you and your family with the highest level of communication throughout. I am always available by phone or email to discuss my potential representation of your injury case. I handle cases throughout Florida. Education: National University of Health Sciences – BS (1984), DC (1986) Valparaiso University School of Law – JD, summa cum laude (1999) Bar Admissions: Florida (2000), Indiana (1999), Illinois (2000, expired); US District Courts of Appeals (11th Circuit, 7th Circuit); United States District Courts: Southern and Middle Districts of Florida; Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana; Northern and Central Districts of Illinois; and District of Colorado. Certification:  Civil Trial, Florida Bar Guy DiMartino on Google+ – Circle Guy on Google+ Guy DiMartino on Google+

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

What makes me Unique?

What distinguishes my firm from the many injury firms throughout the state is my background as a chiropractic physician treating injured patients for 17 years. This gives you the benefit of having someone fighting for you that understands the nature and extent of your injuries and your road to recovery.

We are Partners

If you are my client, we are partners in your road to recovery. You will always have direct access to me to have your questions answered.

Copyright © 2017 Guy S. DiMartino DC, JD, PA

Areas That We Serve: Hammond, IN | Highland , IN | St. John, IN | Schererville, IN | Griffith, IN | Merrillville, IN | Hobart, IN | Portage, IN | Burns Harbor, IN | Ogden Dunes, IN | Gary, IN | South Haven, IN | Valparaiso, IN | Kouts, IN | Knox, IN | Hebron, IN | DeMotte, IN | Cedar Lake, IN | Crown Point, IN | Dyer, IN | Lowell, IN | Michigan City, IN | LaPorte, IN | Wanatah, IN | Westville, IN | Winamac, IN | South Bend, IN | Plymouth, IN | Elkhart, IN | Whiting, IN | Rolling Prairie, IN

Menu